Latest questions

    Asked by: Goutham Gopinathan I’m planning to buy a new car and I live in Chennai, with a budget of 15 to 19 lakhs. I have shortlisted the Kia Sonet HTX and the Skoda Slavia R 1.0. I like the Slavia, but I’m a bit concerned about its mileage. Could you provide me with the expected mileage for the Slavia 1.0 in both automatic and manual versions? Additionally, I’d like to know the mileage for both petrol and diesel versions of the Kia Sonet, including the automatic and manual options. My monthly usage is between 1000 and 1500 km. Thank you! In Autocar India’s real-world tests, the Skoda Slavia 1.0-litre petrol manual delivers an overall mileage of 13kpl (combined city and highway), while the automatic returns 11.95kpl. The manual is more efficient because it has a direct mechanical connection between the engine and the wheels, whereas the automatic uses a torque converter, which, by nature, has some energy losses due to fluid coupling, especially in stop-start urban conditions. The Kia Sonet 1.0-litre turbo-petrol delivers 13.5kpl in manual form and 14.05kpl with the DCT (dual-clutch automatic). The 1.5-litre diesel is more efficient, giving 17.1kpl for the manual and 16.3kpl for the automatic. The diesel Sonet is not only frugal but also surprisingly enjoyable to drive. It has a smooth and refined 6-speed torque converter automatic, which complements the diesel engine’s strong torque delivery well. If fuel efficiency is a top priority, the Sonet diesel is the better option. It’s also well-equipped and has a good-quality interior. However, the Slavia is in a different league when it comes to space, comfort, and overall driving experience. It rides better, feels more planted at high speeds, and offers a more premium feel with strong performance and good safety credentials. That said, turbo-petrol engines like the Slavia’s are sensitive to driving style—drive it hard, and the fuel economy can drop quickly. Based on your monthly running of 1,000 to 1,500km, a diesel Sonet makes a lot of practical sense. But if you’re looking for a bigger, more comfortable car with a more engaging driving experience, the Slavia is still a compelling option—just be ready for slightly higher fuel bills. Hope this helps you make an informed choice.  
    Jul 30, 2025
    Asked by: Aditya Nambiar Planning to buy a used Tata Hexa automatic (XMA/XTA, 2017–2019), which I’ve loved for years. Though options like XUV700, used XUV500, Crysta, Hycross, Harrier, and Safari exist, none appeal to me like the Hexa. I admire its bold, muscular, polarising design, strong features, and tank-like build—it still feels like Tata’s best-built car. Based on ownership feedback, the automatic is smoother, quicker, and more convenient than the manual. I’ve shortlisted 3–4 autos. Is it still a sensible buy in 2025? Dear Mr. Nambiar,   We completely understand your admiration for the Tata Hexa—it has a unique charm and presence that set it apart, even among more recent SUVs. Its body-on-frame construction gives it a robust, go-anywhere feel, and the cabin exudes a sense of luxury that few Tata cars have managed to replicate since. The automatic versions, in particular, are known for their smoothness and convenience. However, being practical, we wouldn’t recommend going ahead with a used Hexa in 2025. The model has been discontinued for over five years now, and as time goes on, sourcing spare parts and finding trained technicians could become increasingly difficult. Tata vehicles, the Hexa included, also don’t age particularly well, and there’s a risk of being saddled with high maintenance costs and reliability issues as the kilometres pile up. Among current options, the Tata Safari comes closest in terms of character, but we agree—it doesn’t quite have the same majestic, tank-like aura of the Hexa. Still, if long-term peace of mind and support matter, you’d be better off considering something more recent and still in production.
    Jul 30, 2025
    Can’t decide which car to buy? Ask our experts and get answers to all your car related queries. Ask experts